Nlp

Lab 2.1: How Word Vectors Learn to Mean — Embeddings From Zero, and What They Secretly Compute Language-model internals series. In the MNIST series we took apart what weights represent for vision. New series, same ritual — build it from scratch, check gradients numerically, claim nothing without a baseline or a measured number. The question for this lab, in the plainest possible form: A word becomes a row of numbers. How can those numbers possibly mean anything? ...

Lab 2.2: A Language Model Without Attention — char-level RNN, backprop through time, and the measured death of gradient signal Language-model internals series. Lab 2.1 gave words geometry without any sequence at all — windows don’t know order. This lab puts order back, the pre-2017 way: a recurrent network that reads one character at a time and carries everything it remembers in one vector. The organizing question of this series, sharpened: ...

Lab 2.3: Gates as Memory Engineering — LSTM from scratch, on a task that was supposed to kill the RNN Language-model internals series. Lab 2.2 measured the diagnosis instead of reciting it: on a trained char-RNN, the forward echo of a character and the backward BPTT blame both halve every ~2.3 steps (per-step retention 0.74), because the transported term per step is (roughly) $W_{hh}^{\top}\mathrm{diag}(1-h^2)$ — every step multiplies your memory by something whose average magnitude is far below 1. ...

Embeddings: From One-Hot Vectors to Learned Representations Everything in the previous notes assumed the network’s input was already a list of numbers — x1 = 1, x2 = 2, pixel intensities, whatever. But most interesting data is not numeric. “cat”, “dog”, “bank”, user IDs, product IDs, words of a sentence. Neural networks cannot multiply the string "cat" by a weight matrix. Somewhere between the raw symbol and the first linear layer, a translation to numbers must happen, and the way we do it — the embedding layer — turns out to be one of the most consequential ideas in modern deep learning. ...